Title

Weed control in soybean with preemergence application of metribuzin and sulfentrazone

(Research Report, Hettinger REC, December 2024)
Summary

A trial was conducted to evaluate weed control resulting from the application of metribuzin and sulfentrazone (Spartan) in soybean. Soybean were planted on May 20, 2024 using a John Deere no-till planter at a depth of 1.5 inches and a seeding rate of 110,000 seeds/A. Plots were four rows of soybean planted in 30-inch rows.  Rows 1 and 2 were planted using soybean variety “AG07XF4; Rows 3 and 4 were planted with soybean variety “AG07XF2”. Two soybean varieties were used to compare varietal tolerance to metribuzin and sulfentrazone. Plot size in this trial was 10 feet wide and 40 feet long. Four replications of treatments were randomized in a randomized complete block. Herbicide treatments were applied after soybean were planted, also on May 20.  Soybean was evaluated for injury at 31 days after planting; no visual injury was observed for either soybean variety (Table 1). Soybean stand was measured from one meter in a random location within each row of each plot, no differences in soybean stand was observed. Kochia, common lambsquarters, and green foxtail were evaluated from control at 31 and 47 days after treatment (DAT). Control of all three weeds increased when metribuzin rate increased from 5.33 to 10.7 oz/A. There was no increase in weed control when the rate of sulfentrazone increased from 4 to 8 oz/A. Kochia control was increased when combinations of metribuzin and sulfentrazone were applied, with 100% kochia control at 47 DAT with the combination of metribuzin at 10.7 oz/A and sulfentrazone at 8 oz/A. Common lambsquarters control was 92 to 100% with sulfentrazone alone and was similar for the combination treatments. Green foxtail control was also best when sulfentrazone and metribuzin were tank-mixed. Weed biomass was measured at 35 and 57 DAT. All treatments reduced weed biomass compared to the untreated, but there were no statistical differences among treatments. Soybean yield was not collected in this trial due to the drought conditions that reduced yield in trial to near zero.

Lead Author
Lead Author:
Caleb Dalley
Availability
Availability:
Web only
Publication Sections

Table 1. Efficacy of weed control and soybean response to preemergence application of metribuzin and Spartan (sulfentrazone) applied alone and as a tank mix at Hettinger, ND, 2024.

  

 Spybean

Kochia

C. lambsquarters

Green foxtail

Weed biomass

  

Injury

Stand

31 DAT

47 DAT

31 DAT

47 DAT

31 DAT

47 DAT

35 DAT

57 DAT

Herbicide

Rate

–– % ––

plants/A

–––––––––––––––––– % control ––––––––––––––––––

––– LB/A –––

1Non-treated

 

0

 

111552

-

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

102

a

2195

a
2Metribuzin

5.33

0

 

115599

-

80

de

78

e

88

c

88

b

79

d

75

c

10

c

860

b
3Metribuzin

10.7

0

 

104912

-

88

bc

82

cd

96

b

90

b

84

cd

82

b

18

bc

788

b
4Spartan

4

0

 

110888

-

83

cd

78

e

100

a

92

ab

85

c

80

b

53

b

733

b
5Spartan

8

0

 

120848

-

76

e

79

de

100

a

100

a

86

c

83

b

36

bc

1003

b
6Metribuzin

5.33

0

 

111552

-

82

d

80

de

100

a

93

ab

88

bc

83

b

14

c

266

b
 Spartan

4

          

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
7Metribuzin

10.7

0

 

118255

-

88

b

85

bc

99

ab

95

ab

92

ab

88

a

16

bc

973

b
 Spartan

4

          

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
8Metribuzin

5.33

0

 

116864

-

88

bc

86

b

100

a

100

a

91

ab

88

a

20

bc

742

b
 Spartan

8

          

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
9Metribuzin

10.7

0

 

109560

-

95

a

100

a

100

a

99

a

94

a

91

a

18

bc

990

b
 Spartan

8

          

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
LSD P=.05

6107.5

4.6

3.2

2.7

8.2

5.1

4.0

37.4

912.5

Standard Deviation

0.0

4164.8

3.1

2.1

1.9

5.6

3.5

2.7

25.5

626.6

CV

0.0

7.38

4.14

2.92

2.15

6.67

4.5

3.68

77.67

65.0

Treatment F

NaN

1.258

342.243

703.957

1245.56

129.608

285.607

429.683

5.070

3.202

Treatment Prob(F)

NaN

0.3140

0.0001

0.0001

0.0001

0.0001

0.0001

0.0001

0.0010

0.0121

Means followed by same letter or symbol do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD). 

Table 2. Application environment and equipment for preemergence application of herbicide treatments for weed control in soybean.

Application Description Application equipment
DateMay-20-2024 Equipment TypeTractor mounted
Start Time4:56 PM Operation Pressure42 PSI
Stop Time5:28 PM Nozzle Model11002DG
Temperature Start, Stop62.3, 61.7 F Nozzle Spacing20 IN
% Relative Humidity Start, Stop37.7, 37.6 % Coverage100
Wind Velocity+Dir. Start3.2 MPH, E Boom Length100 IN
Wind Velocity+Dir. Stop1.5 MPH, E Boom Height20 IN
Wind Velocity+Dir. Max4.8 MPH, E Ground Speed2.8 MPH
Wet Leaves (Y/N) N, no CarrierWATER
Soil Temperature67 F Application Amount15 GAL/AC
Soil MoistureDRY Mix Size3.0 L
% Ground Cover100 PropellantCO2
% Cloud Cover100 Tank Mix (Y/N)Y, yes