Title

Soybean tolerance to preemergence application of metribuzin and sulfentrazone

(Research Report, Hettinger REC, December 2024)
Summary

A trial was conducted to evaluate soybean tolerance to the application of metribuzin and sulfentrazone (Spartan) in soybean. Soybean were planted on May 20, 2024 using a John Deere no-till planter at a depth of 1.5 inches at a seeding rate of 110,000 seed/A. Plots were four rows of soybean planted in 30-inch rows. Rows 1 and 2 were planted using soybean variety “AG07XF4; Rows 3 and 4 were planted with soybean variety “AG07XF2”. Two soybean varieties were used to compare varietal tolerance to metribuzin and sulfentrazone. Plot size in this trial was 10 feet wide and 40 feet long. Four replications of treatments were randomized in a randomized complete block. Herbicide treatments were applied after soybean were planted, also on May 20. All soybean plots were maintained weed free throughout the growing season by way of postemergence applications of glyphosate when weeds emerged in soybean plots. Soybean was evaluated for injury at 31 days after planting; no visual injury was observed for either soybean variety (Table 1). Soybean stand was measured 35 days after treatment (DAT) from one meter in a random location within each of the center two rows of each plot, no differences in soybean stand was observed. Soybean height was measured at 56 DAT by measuring height of 10 random soybean plants within each plot. No differences in soybean height were observed due to herbicide treatment. Soybean was harvested with a small plot combine on September 24. Due to drought conditions, soybean seed were unable to accumulate size and mass and therefore, yields were very low. For soybean variety AG07XF2, there were statistical differences in both yield and test weight of soybean, however, herbicide treatments were always equal to or greater than the untreated control. For variety AG07XF4, no differences were observed in yield or test weight of soybean. From this trial, it appears that under these growing conditions and soil, both metribuzin and sulfentrazone were not injurious to the two soybean varieties tested in this trial. Some soybean varieties are known to be sensitive to either metribuzin and/or sulfentrazone. If using these herbicides, check with seed supplier to verify that the soybean varieties you are planting have a known tolerance to these herbicides. The soil type in this trial is a loam with 34% sand, 45% silt, and 21% clay, with a pH of 5.6 and organic matter of 3.3%. Metribuzin should not be used for weed control in soybean in coarse soils (sand, sandy loam, or loamy sand) with organic matter of 2% or less.  Lower rates of metribuzin are recommended for all soils with organic matter of 2% or less. Similarly, the rate of sulfentrazone labelled for use in soybean is dependent both on soil texture and organic matter. It is important to know these soil parameters in fields where these herbicides will be used for weed control in soybean in order to apply the correct labelled rate and to minimize risk of injury to the soybean crop.

Lead Author
Lead Author:
Caleb Dalley
Availability
Availability:
Web only
Publication Sections

Table 1. Soybean response to preemergence application of metribuzin and sulfentrazone at Hettinger, ND, 2024.

  

 

AG07XF2

AG07XF4

  

Injury

Stand

Height

Yield

Test wt

Yield

Test wt

Herbicide

Rate

–– % ––

plants/A

cm

BU/A

LB/BU

BU/A

LB/BU

1Untreated

 

0

 

106729

-

23

-

6.4

b

47.0

b

6.0

-

44.0

-
2Metribuzin

5.33

0

 

108974

-

23

-

6.8

ab

50.9

ab

6.4

-

47.7

-
3Metribuzin

10.7

0

 

106352

-

23

-

6.6

ab

49.3

ab

6.5

-

47.4

-
4Spartan

4

0

 

109761

-

22

-

6.9

ab

51.9

ab

6.6

-

48.6

-
5Spartan

8

0

 

119901

-

23

-

7.5

a

55.0

a

6.7

-

50.0

-
6Metribuzin

5.33

0

 

108383

-

24

-

7.2

ab

53.5

a

7.0

-

52.2

-
 Spartan

4

          

 

 

 

 
7Metribuzin

10.7

0

 

114512

-

23

-

7.0

ab

52.4

ab

6.5

-

47.8

-
 Spartan

4

          

 

 

 

 
8Metribuzin

5.33

0

 

99898

-

23

-

7.0

ab

52.3

ab

6.4

-

48.0

-
 Spartan

8

          

 

 

 

 
9Metribuzin

10.7

0

 

107546

-

23

-

6.7

ab

49.6

ab

6.5

-

48.2

-
 Spartan

8

          

 

 

 

 
LSD P=.05

.

10337.1

1.3

0.88

6.04

0.85

6.52

Standard Deviation

0.0

7112.0

0.8

0.59

4.06

0.57

4.39

CV

0.0

6.52

3.74

9.12

8.33

9.26

9.48

Treatment F

NaN

1.935

2.161

2.539

2.817

1.679

1.763

Treatment Prob(F)

NaN

0.0972

0.0833

0.0480

0.0324

0.1718

0.1512

Table 2. Application environment and equipment for preemergence application of herbicide treatments for weed control in soybean.

Application Description Application equipment
DateMay-20-2024 Equipment TypeTractor mounted
Start Time4:27 PM Operation Pressure42 PSI
Stop Time4:50 PM Nozzle Model11002DR
Temperature Start, Stop64.3, 62.2 F Nozzle Spacing20 IN
% Relative Humidity Start, Stop37.9, 39.1 % Coverage100
Wind Velocity+Dir. Start4.8 MPH, E Boom Length100 IN
Wind Velocity+Dir. Stop5.1 MPH, E Boom Height20 IN
Wind Velocity+Dir. Max7.3 MPH, E Ground Speed2.8 MPH
Wet Leaves (Y/N) N, no CarrierWATER
Soil Temperature67 F Application Amount15 GAL/AC
Soil MoistureDRY Mix Size3.0 L
% Ground Cover100 PropellantCO2
% Cloud Cover100 Tank Mix (Y/N)Y, yes